다름 ::= Diffrence

I'm not so sure translation is a good way of learning english. Especially for the beginners. What I want to say is, read english and understand itself is what all we need. And for me, translating is one more step from it. Just like reading "I am a boy.". Nobody has to translate that sentence. But If sentence become more complex, you will probably change your mind and get your mind prepared to translate as you learned in a school. bBut before that, read it several times more and try to feel it's meaning. If you feel even though you can't explane in Korean. That's o.k. Your doing well.

Doing something and explaining something is totally different. It's like "catching a ball". Anyhow good or not, you can catch a ball. So, can you explain how to? And there is another question, Do you really do the way you explain? Probably not.
English teachers taught you how to translate because it has a perfect way to explain how. But Language is not for calculate, encrypt or analyze. 
There is a complex Korean text also, how do you do with it? Do you try to encrypt or calculate as you do with English?

I did practice English by this method from the biggining, and there is pros and cons. the biggist problem was that there was noway to prove. My TOIEC scores sucks, the last one I got was around five or six hundred point- although it was very long time ago. no knowledge about grammar. Nobody had believed I could talk or read properly. But I could do what I want to do with English. Its because I just aim to do what I wanted to do. If you want to use english in various field and reason. its little bit different. but If you just want to read dev-document and nothing else, just start reading it, At the beginning It will stuck with grammar and vocabularies, but during the repeated practice you will find there is very small set of those where needed. 
Sometime I wish I had some more grammar, vocab, or scores. but actually Its not worth then what I can do right now. what is more important to you? find it and aim it.

Sorry for talking this at a last, though I design to do it on purpose. I'm not sure this method can be work on you. I was born in U.S. and short period of time, I had been lived there, and also I'm living right now in U.S. 
But after living there one to two, and six to seven years of my life, I forgot all about English. When I was in elementry school in Korea, I even don't know the famous dialog such as 'How do you do?' - well, the fact is I can't feel that sentence even now. I re-start my English same as you, from the middle school. And I thought I was same as normal Koreans until the last years of high school. 
One day during the night study, a friend of mine complaining about the time shortage of english exam. I was curious why. And I look in to his working. He was translating. Oh my god! The translating process was exactly the same as the teacher does in a class. Translate the words, and analyze the form of sentence, and re-build to Korean sentense. I realized the importance of my experience in U.S. And with that experience, I realized everybody has to know another way to learn a language. I mean, this method. 
Lots of people shock about this method, and lots of friends who know my history refuse to admit It can work for them.
And also I have practicing this more then a decade, and your not. Does it really worth to annoy your self to change the way of your own? I'm really not sure. But I really wanted to talk about this, because I belive there is someone who cannot concentrate to study english by original method. And for them, this can be a great help.
I appreciate for reading this rough text, this far.
Thank you.

http://weekly.donga.com/docs/magazine/weekly/2010/08/02/201008020500023/201008020500023_1.html

이미 오래된 이야기지만, IT의 발전으로 UCC라 불리는 새로운 대중문화가 만들어졌다.

망 중립성. 특정 기기나 서비스가 트래픽을 과다하게 생성한다고 해서 재제를 하는 것은 아무래도 옳지 않다. 

'포스트PC'의 시대에서 가장 애매한 위치를 차지하고 있는 것이 아마도 스마트TV이다. 시대적 변화에 의해 시장지배력이 떨어지는 TV시장에 위기감을 느낀 각 회사들은 기존에 쌓아둔 경제력을 바탕으로 갖은 방법을 동원해 활로를 모색하고 있다만 아직 확실한 새로운 가능성을 찾지는 못하고 있다.

기존의 방송과 수신기로 구분되어 수신기의 역할을 고수하기엔 PC의 부속품격인 '모니터'와의 차이가 없지만 이를 인정하자니 자신들보다 한참 어린 산업에 머리를 조아려야 하는 상황이 마음에 썩 들지 않은 것이다.

이에대한 타계책을 위해 PC 와 어깨를 견주기 위해 PC의 프로세싱을 도입하려 하는 것이 바로 스마트 티비. 하지만 단일목적을 위한 수신/영사장치에서 출발한 TV가 애초에 다목적 기능(연산)을 수행하기 위해 만들어진 컴퓨터와 각축을 벌이기엔 아직 산적한 문제가 너무 많다.
더구나 TV는 PC에서 시작한 포스트PC의 개념과 상충되는 가장 큰 부분이 있으니 말 그대로 'Personal'이 아니라는 점이다. 가족용, 혹은 좀더 과거로 올라가 마을전체가 티비를 구경하러 하러 한 집에 모일 수 있는 그야말로 공용(public)장치로서의 문화가 스며있는 TV에 개인적(personal)이고 사적(private)인 PC의 컨텐츠를 이식한다 하여도 그 문화적 갭이 있는 이상 스마트 TV는 PC의 아류로서 남을 것이다.

스마트티비는 두가지 방향의 해법을 찾아야 한다.
공용입력장치, 그리고 공용컨텐츠.
리모콘의 걸림돌을 넘어 티비 앞의 사람이 모두 함께 사용할 수 있는 입력수단.
그리고 그를 이용하여 할 수 있는 컨텐츠나 케리어의 개발.
TV시장의 타겟은 혼자 사는 집이 아닌 많은 사람들이 북적이는 곳. 단순하게 가족으로 제한하지 말고 친구들(술집), 회사의 동료들(회의실). 스마트 티비는 '함께 사용'하기위한 목표가 달성될 때 만이 티비 속에 녹아있는 문화와 함께 티비로서의 정체성을 가지고 살아남을 수 있다.